Formas y pragmatismo en la filosofía de Francis Bacon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/sst.2025.10.4903Keywords:
simple nature, corpuscular structure, laws, rulesAbstract
This essay analyses the relationship between two aspects of the philosopher Francis Bacon’s proposal in his work Novum Organum (NO): the pragmatic vision of science and the knowledge of forms to which human knowledge aspires in general. This analysis is developed in consideration of di↵erent interpretations of the Baconian concept of form, in the light of the author’s empiricism and pragmatism. Among these interpretations, some have been preferred for their appropriateness and for their contribution to the understanding of the relationship under review, allowing a glimpse of how science, knowledge of forms and practice are articulated to improve the human situation.
References
Bacon, F. (2003). Novum Organum. (C. F. Almorí, Trad.). Losada.
Cameron, E. W. (1964). Francis Bacon and the Pragmatic Theory of Forms. Philosophical Forum , pp. 592-610. https://api.core.ac.uk/oai/oai:yorkspace.library.yorku.ca:10315/37086
Dickie, W. M. (1923). “FORM” AND “SIMPLE NATURE” IN BACON’S PHILOSOPHY. The Monist, 33(3) pp. 428–437. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27900958
Frondizi, R. (2003). Significado y contenido del Novum Organum. En F. Bacon, Novum Organum (C. F. Almorí, Trad., págs. 9-35). Losada.
Klein, J. (2020). Francis Bacon. Obtenido de Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/francis-bacon
Romero, G. E. (2018). Scientific Philosophy. Cham: Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97631-0
Schwartz, D. (2014). Baconian Foundationalism and the Problem of Certainty. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7r33h8t7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.