Las ficciones como artefactos en la obra de Jorge Luis Borges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/sst.2015.5.5060Keywords:
filosofía, lógica, ficción, creación, dinámica, artefactoAbstract
En esta intervención me propongo abordar la noción de ficción en la obra de Jorge Luis Borges desde la perspectiva de la teoría artefactual de Amie Thomasson, presentada principalmente en su libro Fiction and Metaphysics (1999). Los conceptos y supuestos metafísicos que conforman la perspectiva de Thomasson plantean una nueva teoría para la interpretación de textos literarios. A partir de esta perspectiva, intentaré mostrar que la lectura de ciertas secuencias de la obra de Borges da nuevos sentidos y permite postular que en ellas se encuentra prefigurada la noción de artefacto defendida por Thomasson. Me ocuparé especialmente de Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius pues postulamos que en esta fábula teórica2 Borges lleva al límite las posibilidades literarias y filosóficas de la noción de ficción.
References
Almeida, Ivan, 2006, “Celebración del apócrifo en Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius”, en El Fragmento infinito. Estudios sobre Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius de J.L.Borges, Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza, pp. 99-122.
Balderston, Daniel, 1996, Fuera de contexto? : Referencialidad histórica y expresión de la realidad en Borges. Buenos Aires : B. Viterbo.
Balderston, Daniel, 1996, “Borges, Averroes, Aristotle: The poetics of poetics”, Hispania, Vol. 79, N° 2, pp. 201-207.
Bencivenga, Ermanno, 1983, “Free Logics” en Dov M. Gabbay, F. Guenther, eds., Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. 3: Alternatives to Classical Logic, pp. 373-426. Synthese Library, 166. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
Blanco, Mercedes, 2006, “Arqueologías de Tlön. Borges y el Urn Burial de Browne.” El Fragmento infinito. Estudios sobre Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius de J.L.Borges. Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza. pp.73-99.
Block de Behar, Lisa, 1987, Al margen de Borges. Siglo veintiuno editores.
Borges, Jorge Luis, 1974, Obras Completas. Vol. I. Buenos Aires.
Borges, Jorge Luis, 1997, Ficciones, Alianza (Biblioteca Borges). Brentano, F., Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Leipzig: Duncke & Humblot, 1874. (2ème edition par Oskar Kraus, 1924, Leipzig: Meiner). Psychologie du point de vue empirique, traduction par M. de Gandillac-J-F Courtine. Paris : J. Vrin, 2008.
Cassin, Barbara, 1986, “Du faux ou du mensonge à la fiction (de pseudos à plasma)”, Le Plaisir de parler, actes du colloque de Cerisy, Editions de Minuit, Arguments.
Compagnon, Antoine, 1998, Le démon de la théorie, Seuil.
Currie, Gregory, 1988, Fictional Names, Australian Journal of Philosophy, vol.66, 4.
Currie, Gregory. 1990, The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fontaine, M. & Rahman, S., 2010, Fiction, Creation and Fictionality. An Overview. Méthodos, Univ. Lille3.
Fontaine, M., Redmond J., Rahman S., 2009, “Etre et Etre choisi, Vers une logique dynamique de la fiction”, in Fictions : logiques, langages, mondes, col. Cahiers de logique et d’Epistémologie, J. Dubucs & B. Hill Eds., College Publications, Londres. (En prensa).
Fontaine, M. and Rahman, S., 2010, “Fiction, Creation and Fictionality”, in Methodos, 10, , http://methodos.revues.org/
Frege Gottlob, 1892, Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, NF 100, 1892, S. 25-50. [en Gottlob Frege. Écrits Logiques et Philosophiques, trad. par Claude Imbert (1994; 1971 pour la première édition). Paris: Seuil, “Points essais”.]
Gamut, L. T. F. 1991, Logic, language, and meaning. Vol1. Introduction to logic -- Vol. 2. Intensional logic and logical grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Genette, Gérard, 1991, Fiction et diction, Seuil, Poétique.
Goloboff, Mario, 2006, Leer Borges. Buenos Aires: Catálogos.
Goodman, Nelson, 1954, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. University of London: Athlone Press. (4th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1983).
Gochet, P., Gribomont, P., Thayse, A., 2000, Logique. Volume 3, méthodes pour l’intelligence artificielle. Paris : Hermes science.
Grau, Cristina, 1992, Borges et l’architecture. Paris : Editions du Centre Pompidou.
Hamburger Käte, 1986, Logique des genres littéraires. Paris, Seuil.
Hintikka, J., 1969, “Semantics for Propositional Attitudes”, en J. W. Davis, D.J.Hockney et W.K.Wilson (eds.), Philosophical Logic, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp.21-45.
Husserl, Edmund, 1900/1970, Logical Investigations, (Engl. Transl. by Findlay, J.N.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Ingarden, Roman, 1931, The Literary Work of Art. Translated by George Grabowicz. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Kaplan, Marina E., 1984, “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius” y “Urn Burial”, Comparative Literature. Duke University Press on behalf of the University of Oregon. Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 328-342.
Keiff, L., 2009, « Dialogical Logic », entrée de la Stanford Encyclopedi of Philosophy.
Kripke, Saul, 1972, Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Massachussets, Harvard Uniersity Press.
Lafon, Michel, 1990, Borges ou la réécriture. Paris : Seuil.
Lambert, Karel, 1997, Free Logics: Their Foundations, Character, and Some Applications Thereof. ProPhil: Projekte zur Philosophie, Bd. 1. Sankt Augustin, Germany: Academia.
Lavocat, François, 2004, Usages et théories de la fiction. Le débat contemporain à l’épreuve des textes anciens (XVI-XVIIIe siècles) – PUR.
Lavocat, François, 2007, Les théories de la fiction, Livre blanc de la S.F.L.G.C, Presses universitaires de Valenciennes.
Leonard, Henri S., 1956 (june). “The logic of existence”, Philosophical Studies, vol. VII, n°4, Michigan State University.
Leonard, Henri S., Goodman, Nelson, 1940 (june), “The calculus of individuals and its uses”, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 5, N°2, Association for Symbolic Logic.
MacColl, H., Symbolic Logic and its Applications, London/New York/Bombay: Longmans, Green & Co., 1906. [en Rahman, S. & Redmond, J., 2007. Hugh MacColl. An overview of his Logical Work with Anthology. London: College Publications. (Trad. Sébastien Magnier : Hugh MacColl Et La Naissance Du Pluralisme Logique: Suivi D’extraits Majeurs De Son Œuvre, college publications].
Meinong, Alexius, 1904, “Über Gegenstandstheorie” in Meinong 1904a, 1–51. Reprinted in Meinong 1968–78, Vol. II: 481–535. (Théorie de l’objet, 1999. trad. Jean-François Courtine et Marc de Launay, Vrin.).
Montalbetti, Christine, 2001, La Fiction. GF Flammarion, Paris.
Parsons, Terence, 1980, Non-existent Objects. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Pavel, Thomas, 1988, Univers de la fiction. Paris : Éd. du Seuil.
Pouivet, Roger, 1996, Esthétique et logique. Bruxelles : Mardaga.
Priest, Graham, 2005, Towards Non-Being. The logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Rahman, S. & Keiff, L., 2004,“On how to be a dialogician”. In D. Vanderveken (ed.): Logic, Thought and Action, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 359–408.
Rahman, S. & Redmond, J., 2008, “Hugh MacColl and the Birth of Logical Pluralism”. In : J. Woods § D. Gabbay Handbook of History of Logic, Elsevier, vol. 4, pp. 535-606.
Rahman, S., 2009, Idealizations as Prescriptions and the Role of Fiction in Science. Towards a Formal Semantics. À paraître Marco Pina, Models and Metaphors - Between Science and Art (ed.), London : College Publications.
Rahman, S., 2001, “On Frege’s Nightmare. A Combination of Intuitionistic, Free and Paraconsistent Logics”. In H. Wansing, (ed.), Essays on Non-Classical Logic, River Edge, New Jersey: World Scientific, pp. 61–85.
Rahman, S. & Fontaine, M., 2010, Fiction, Creation and Fictionality An Overview. Revue Methodos (CNRS, UMR 8163, STL).+ (en prensa).
Rahman, S. and Tulenheimo, T., 2009, Fictions as Creations and the Fictionality operator (en prensa).
Read, S., 1994, Thinking About Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
Redmond, J. & Fontaine, M., 2008, Logique Dialogique : une introduction – Première partie : Méthode de dialogique : règles et exercices, col. Cahiers de logique et Epistémologie Vol. 5, D. Gabbay & Sh. Rahman Eds., College Publications, Londres.
Russell, Bertrand, 1905, « On Denoting », in Mind (14) pp. 479- 493.
Schaeffer Jean-Marie, 1999, Pourquoi la fiction ?, Paris, Éditions du Seuil, coll. « Poétique ».
Searle, John, 1979, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John, 1983, Intentionality. Cambridge University Press.
Simons, P., 1987, Parts. A study in ontology. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Smith, David Woodruff, McIntyre Ronald, 1982, Husserl and Intentionality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Stepanians, Markus, 2001, Gottlob Frege zur Einführung. Junius Verlag (Hamburg), (trad. Juan Redmond, college publications, 2007).
Thomasson, Amie L., 1999, Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomasson, Amie L., 2003, “Speaking of Fictional Characters”. Dialectica, Vol. 57, No.2: 207-226.
Tulenheimo, Tero, 2009, “Remarks on Individuals in Modal Contexts.”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie (en prensa).
Van Inwagen, Peter, 1983, “Fiction and Metaphysics”. Philosophy and Literature 7: pp. 67-77
Voltolini, Alberto, 2006, How Ficta Follow Fiction. A Syncretistic Account of Fictional Entities, Springer, Dordrecht.
Walton, Kendall, 1990, Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Woods, John, 1974, The Logic of Fiction. A Philosophical Sounding of Deviant Logic, La Haye, Mouton.
Woods, John, 2007, “Fictions and their logic”. en Dale Jacquette, editor, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, edited by Dov M. Gabbay, Paul Thagard and John Woods, volume 5, Philosophy of Logic, pages 1061-1126. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Zalta, Edward, 1983, Abstract Objects. The Netherlands: Reidel.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.