Instrumental colorimetric evaluation of composite resins that mimic dentin by a vita classic scale comparison
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2020.1.1.2113Keywords:
Composite, Color, Dentin, Spectrophotometry, Dental aestheticsAbstract
Objective: To quantitatively determine in 7 different commercial brands of composite resins that mimic dentin (Filtek Z350XT® 3M ESPE™, Miris 2® Coltène™, Empress Direct® Ivoclar Vivadent™, Opallis® FGM™, TPH Spectra® DentsplySirona™ Tetric N Ceram® Ivoclar Vivadent™, Brilliant Everglow® Coltène™) coded as Vita Clásica Vita Zahnfabrik™’s A2 and A3 or an equivalent dye, the difference in color (ΔE) with the Vita Classic scale for that codification on a black or white background.
Materials and methods: In vitro descriptive study. 7 composite resin brands (N 35) in A3 and A2 tones were used, 10 mm diameter and 2 mm thick discs were made, measured with spectrophotometry on two backgrounds with Vita Easyshade V® Vita Zahnfabrik ™ instrument. The values obtained in CIELAB were analyzed obtaining ΔE. An ANOVA 2 factor test (a0.05) was performed.
Results: The ΔE closest to the Vita Classic® scale was given by TPH Spectra® DentsplySirona ™ A2 (1.02 ± .69), the largest ΔE was Filtek Z350XT® 3M ESPE ™ (69.31 ± .50).
Conclusion: There are clear differences between composite resins of the studied brands and the Vita Classical scale. On a black background 71.4% of all samples and on a white background 92.8% are on a ΔE 5, meaning that the differences between their dyes are considered clinically unacceptable. None of the composite resin brands meet the colorimetric characteristics when compared to the Vita Classic scale.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in their institutional repositories or on their website) only after publication online.
When uploading, disseminating or repurposing Open Access publications, the journal should be clearly identified as the original source and proper citation information provided. In addition to the Version of Record (final published version), authors should deposit the URL/DOI of their published article in any repository.