BENEFITS OF DOULA SUPPORT DURING THE ACTIVE PHASE OF LABOR ANDBIRTH IN A HOSPITAL IN MEXICO

Authors

  • JUANA OYUELA GARCÍA INTITUTO MEXICANO DEL SEGURO SOCIAL
  • DORA ELIA SILVA LUNA PARTERAS MONTERREY N.L.
  • FRANCISCO RAFAEL GUZMAN FACUNDO UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE NUEVO LEON

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/bre.101.2025.4851.

Keywords:

Labor, Obstetric, Doulas, Humanizing Delivery, Obstetric Nursing

Abstract

Introduction: Continuous support during labor improves maternal experience and perinatal outcomes. However, the integration of doulas into healthcare systems faces several barriers. Objective: To evaluate the effects of doula support during the active phase of labor and childbirth. Methodology: A quasi-xperimental study was conducted in a high-specialty hospital in Monterrey, Mexico. Two groups of women in labor were compared: one received continuous support from a doula (n= 58) and the other received standard care only (n = 42). Clinical indicators (labor progression), care indicators (duration of support), and maternal–infant well-being outcomes (mother–infant bonding) were analyzed. Results: Participants had a mean age of 24.2 years (SD = 5.28); 61% (n = 61) were primigravidas and 16% (n = 16) had a history of miscarriage. The intervention group had a higher frequency of eutocic births (36.2%; n = 21 vs. 23.8%; n = 10), though this difference was not statistically significant (p = .287). Women who received doula support showed greater cervical dilation (4.98 cm vs. 4.10 cm, p = .001) and a higher percentage of cervical effacement (73.79%; n = 43 vs. 71.67%; n = 30, p = .023). Moreover, mother–infant bonding was significantly higher in this group (x² = 9.87, p = .002). Conclusion: Doula support promotes better labor progression and strengthens maternal–infant bonding. These findings support the importance of including doulas in obstetric care models to promote humanized childbirth and reduce unnecessary medical interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Mortalidad Materna [Internet]. 2023 Feb. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality

Secretaría de Salud. 251. En últimos 12 años, México redujo más de 46% mortalidad materna: Dirección General de Epidemiología [Internet]. 2023 Aug. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/salud/prensa/251-en-ultimos-12-anos-mexico-redujo-mas-de-46-mortalidad-materna-direccion-general-de-epidemiologia

Gudmundsson P, Elden H, Larsson A, Sundén J, Björkman A, Tegnér H, et al. A qualitative study of the experience of doula support to women in socially disadvantaged positions in Sweden: The voices of women and doulas. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2024;41:101016. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101016

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Guía OMS de cuidados durante el trabajo de parto: manual del usuario [Internet]. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-18.12

Castellanos-Villegas AE, Hernández-García JD, Vázquez-Martínez ER. Papel de las hormonas progesterona, estradiol y oxitocina en la función del miometrio durante el embarazo y el trabajo de parto. Perinatol Reprod Hum. 2023;37(1):31-8. doi: 10.24875/per.22000013

Cobo A, Jiménez EIA. Parto humanizado y la función de enfermería en los establecimientos de salud pública. Enferm Investiga. 2022;7(1):73-8. doi: 10.31243/ei.uta.v7i1.994.2022

Vásquez Truisi ML, Campos-Quintero L. El cuidado de enfermería generador de confianza de la mujer durante el trabajo de parto. Rev Colomb Enferm. 2021;20(1). doi: 10.18270/rce.v20i1.2830

Raposo NM, Jurgens CY. Nurses' Role in the Birth Experience: An Integrative Review. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2025;50(2):99-106. doi:10.1097/NMC.0000000000001080

Colmenares J, Ramírez B. Volvamos al parto humanizado. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 2024;84(3):316-28. doi: 10.51288/00840313

Amorim LF, Leal EC da C, Viana MRP. Performance of the doulas during the pregnancy-puerperal cycle: a literature review. Res Soc Dev. 2020;9(7):e598974505. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4505

Da Silva Lins HN, Macêdo Paiva LK, Souza MG, Cassimiro Lima RM, Andrade Albuquerque NL. Vivências na assistência à mulher: percepção das doulas. Rev Enferm UFPE Online. 2019;13(5):1264-9. doi: 10.5205/1981-8963-v13i5a238358p1264-1269-2019

Dodou HD, Rodrigues DP, Guerreiro EM, Guedes MV, Lago PN, Mesquita NS. La contribución del acompañante para la humanización del parto y nacimiento: percepciones de mujeres después del parto. Esc Anna Nery. 2014;18:262-9. doi: 10.5935/1414-8145.20140038

Otten MJ. Effects of labor support from doulas on birth outcomes [Master's thesis]. Bethel University; 2019. Available from: https://spark.bethel.edu/etd/494

Ramey-Collier K, Jackson M, Malloy A, McMillan C, Scraders-Pyatt A, Wheeler SM. Doula care: A review of outcomes and impact on birth experience. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2023;78(2):124–7. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000001103

Gray JR, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 9th ed. Elsevier; 2020.

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

Secretaría de Salud. Reglamento de la Ley General de Salud en materia de investigación para la salud [Internet]. México, D.F.; 1987. Available from: http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/compi/rlgsmis.html

Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6

Knocke K, Chappel A, Sugar S, Lew ND, Sommers BD. Doula care and maternal health: An evidence review. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Health Policy; 2022. Available from: https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/dfcd768f1caf6fabf3d281f762e8d068/ASPE-Doula-Issue-Brief-12-13-22.pdf

Gruber KJ, Cupito SH, Dobson CF. Impact of doulas on healthy birth outcomes. J Perinat Educ. 2013;22(1):49–58. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.22.1.49

Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5

González N. Contacto piel con piel en el posparto inmediato. Gac Med Caracas. 2021;129(3S):S562-72. Available from: http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_gmc/article/view/23014

Hewedy AA, Shalaby NS, Nasr EH, Osman SAR. Effect of immediate mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact on maternal and neonatal health. Port Said Sci J Nurs. 2023;10(2):250-76. doi: 10.21608/pssjn.2023.165383.1223

Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia - UNICEF. La lactancia materna desde la primera hora de vida: lo que beneficia y lo que perjudica [Internet]. 2018 Aug. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/es/historias/la-lactancia-materna-desde-la-primera-hora-de-vida-lo-que-beneficia-y-lo-que-perjudica

Published

2025-12-16

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

1-10 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.