La abducción interrogativa de Hintikka en el razonamiento de Darwin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/lv.2024.30.1.4497Palabras clave:
principio de divergencia, abducción, teoría de la evolución, ilosofía de la biología, Peirce, descubrimientoResumen
Una de las propuestas más innovadoras al concepto original de abducción de Peirce es la efectuada por Hintikka. A diferencia de la concepción Peirceana construida a partir de una estructura silogística de bajo poder lógico, Hintikka libera la abducción de las restricciones impuestas por el aparato deductivo, ubicando el concepto en un esquema interrogativo más flexible en que el investigador orienta sus pasos de manera estratégica y organizada hacia el descubrimiento final. Paavola ejemplifica la nueva definición de abducción usando el descubrimiento de la teoría de evolución de Darwin como evidencia histórica. En este trabajo sostengo que el ejemplo usado por Paavola es equivocado, principalmente por una interpretación incorrecta de los descubrimientos de Darwin. Una inspección detallada de las libretas de Darwin, sin embargo, revela que el razonamiento de Darwin en la búsqueda del Principio de Divergencia, la última hipótesis antes de publicar el Origen de las Especies, es consistente con la propuesta de Hintikka, aunque en un segmento histórico distinto del señalado por Paavola.
Citas
Barlow, N. (Ed.) (1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. Collins.
Barrett, P. H., Gautrey P. J., Herbert S., Kohn D., & Smith S. (Eds.). (1987). Darwin’s notebooks, 1836-1844: geology, transmutation of species, metaphysical enquiries. Cambridge University Press.
Bartelborth, T. (1999). Coherence and Explanations. Erkenntnis, 50(2), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005594409663
BonJour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Harvard University Press.
Browne, J. (1980). Darwin’s botanical arithmetic and the “Principle of divergence”, 1854-1858. Journal of the History of Biology, 13(1), 53-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125354
Browne, J. (2006). Darwin’s origin of species. Atlantic Books.
Burkhardt, F., Porter D., Browne J., & Richmond, M. (2009). The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Anniversary Set 1821-1860. Cambridge University Press.
Campos, D. G. (2011). On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the best explanation. Synthese, 180(3), 419-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9709-3
Chambers, R. (1844). Vestiges of the natural history of creation. John Churchill.
Corsi, P. (1988). The age of Lamarck: evolutionary theories in France, 1790-1830. University of California Press.
Cowles, T. (1937). Malthus, Darwin, and Bagehot: A Study in the Transference of a Concept. Isis, 26(2), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1086/347184
Darwin, E. (1794). Zoonomia, or the laws of organic life: Vols I & II. Johnson.
Darwin, C. R. (1854). A monograph on the subclass Cirripedia, with figures of all the species. The Balanidae, (or sessile cirripedes) Vol. 2; the Verrucidae. The Ray Society.
Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.
Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.
de Beer, G. (1960). Darwin’s notebooks on the transmutation of species. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Historical Series, 2, 23-183.
Eiseley, L. (1958). Darwin’s century: evolution and the men who discovered it. Doubleday Anchor Books,
Evans, L.T. (1984). Darwin’s use of the analogy between artificial and natural selection. Journal of the History of Biology, 17, 113-140.
Ghiselin, M.T. (1969). The triumph of the Darwinian method. University of Chicago Press.
Grant, R. (1826). Observations on the nature and importance of geology. Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, 14, 270-284.
Gruber, H.E. (1981). On the relation between “aha experiences” and the construction of ideas. History of Science, 19, 41-59.
Gruber, H.E. & Bödeker, K. (Eds.). (2005). Creativity, psychology and the history of science. Boston Series in the Philosophy of Science.
Hanson, N.R. (1958a). The logic of discovery. Journal of Philosophy, 55, 1073-1089.
Hanson, N. R. (1958b). Patterns of discovery: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge University Press.
Harman, G.H. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88-95.
Hennig, W. (1950). Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag.
Hintikka, J. (1989). The role of logic in argumentation. Monist, 72, 3-24.
Hintikka, J. (1998). What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 34, 503-533.
Hintikka, J. (1999a). Inquiry as inquiry: a logic of scientific discovery. Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hintikka, J. (1999b). Is logic the key to all good reasoning? En Hintikka, J. (Ed.), Inquiry as inquiry: a logic of scientific discovery, Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hodge, M.J.S. (1982). Darwin and the laws of the animate part of the terrestrial system (1835–1837): on the Lyellian origins of his zoonomical explanatory program. Studies in the History of Biology, 7, 1-106.
Hodge, M.J.S. (1985). Darwin as a lifelong generation theorist. En Kohn, D. (Ed.), The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton University Press.
Hodge, M.J.S. & Kohn, D. (1985), The immediate origins of natural selection. En Kohn, D. (Ed.), The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton University Press.
Kapitan, T. (1997). Peirce and the structure of abductive inference. En Houser, N., Roberts, D.D. &. Evra, J.V. (Eds.), Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana University Press.
Kiikeri, M. (2001). Abduction, IBE, and the discovery of Kepler’s ellipse. En Kiikeri, M. & Ylikoski, P. (Eds.), Explanatory connections: explanatory essays dedicated to Matti Sintonen. http://www.helsinki.fi/tint/matti
Kohn, D. (1980). Theories to work by: rejected theories, reproduction, and Darwin’s path to natural selection. Studies in the History of Biology, 4, 67-170.
Kohn, D. (Ed.) (1985a). The Darwinian heritage. Princeton University Press.
Kohn, D. (1985b). Darwin’s principle of divergence as internal dialogue. En Kohn, D. (Ed.), The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton University Press.
Lamarck, J. B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique ou exposition des considérations relatives à l’histoire naturelle des animaux. Cambridge University Press.
Limoges, C. (1970). La sélection naturelle: etude sur la premiére constitution d’un concept (1837–1859). Presses Universitaires de France.
Limoges, C. (1977). La sélection naturelle. Vrin.
Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation. Routledge.
Lugg, A. (1985). The process of discovery. Philosophy of Science, 52, 207-220.
Lyell, Ch. (1830). Principles of geology (vol. 1), being an attempt to explain the former changes of the Earth’s surface, by reference to causes now in operation. John Murray.
Mackonis, A. (2013). Inference to the best explanation, coherence and other explanatory virtues. Synthese, 190, 975-995.
Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: processes of discovery and explanation. Kluwer Academic.
Malthus, T.R. (1798). An essay on the priciple of population. Oxford University Press.
McMullin, E. (1992). The inference that makes science. Marquette University Press.
Milne-Edwards, H. (1851). Introduction à la Zoologie Générale. Victor Masson.
Minnameier, G. (2004). Peirce-suit of truth: why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused. Erkenntnis, 60, 75-105.
Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Defending abduction. Philosophy of Science, 66, S436-S451.
Niiniluoto, I. (2018). Truth-seeking by adbuction. Synthese Library 400, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Springer.
Ospovat, D. (1981). The development of Darwin’s theory: natural history, natural theology, and natural selection, 1838-1859. Cambridge University Press.
Paavola, S. (2004). Abduction as a logic of discovery: the importance of strategies. Foundations of Science, 9, 267-283.
Paavola, S. (2006). Hansonian and Harmanian abduction as models of discovery. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 20, 91-106.
Paley, W. (1802). Natural theology: or evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity. J. Faulder.
Peacocke, C. (1992). A study of concepts. MIT Press.
Peirce, C.S. (1901). On the logic of drawing history from ancient documents, especially from testimonies. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2 (1893–1913). Bloomington.
Peirce, C.S. (1903). Conferencias de Harvard sobre el pragmatismo. En Houser, N. & Kloesel, C. (Eds.), Peirce, Charles Sanders. Obra filosófica reunida. Tomo II (1893-1913). Fondo de Cultura Economica.
Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. 1-8. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (Eds.). Harvard University Press
Plutynski, A. (2011). Four problems of abduction: A brief history. Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 1, 227-248.
Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific realism: how science tracks truth. Routledge.
Schweber, S. S. (1980). Darwin and the political economists: Divergence of character. Journal of the History of Biology, 13(2), 195-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125744
Simon, H. A. (1973). Does Scientific Discovery Have a Logic? Philosophy of Science, 40(4), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1086/288559
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Strahan & Cadell.
Stauffer, R. C. (Ed.). (1975). Charles Darwin’s natural selection: being the second part of his Big Species Book written from 1856 to 1858. Cambridge University Press.
Tammone, W. (1995). Competition, the Division of Labor, and Darwin’s Principle of Divergence. Journal of the History of Biology, 28(1), 109-131.
Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(3), 435-467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00057046
Whewell, W. (1837). History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present times. John W. Parker.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Rodrigo Medel
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
